Welcome to Lee-Soft.com, I hope you enjoy your stay


Dev Blog (Latest) - What's next for Lee-Soft.com - You decide!

August 17, 2010, 05:24:28 AM

 


After I release a new ViGlance build next month to fix the minor issues people are having with the new build - I will be turning my attention to another project and developing that for a while. At this stage; I am pleased with ViStart's current stability and ViGlance's current stability and I would primarily be focusing on new features for these products (if I were to develop them). However the other projects which are collecting dust such as ViSplore and ViOrb need stability improvements. ViOrb still operates on a hooking mechanism which I decided last year isn't viable (For those unaware - hooking means to literally hack another process and catch the information it receives and process them in your application (Imagine having a mail forwarding on your inbox - It would surely take longer for the messages to get forwarded). ViSplore currently doesn't add anything new (other than breadcrumb toolbar) to Explorer and it still doesn't replace the default explorer correctly. Whilst eye-candy is everything to some users - functionality is more important to me - Eye candy comes after in my opinion. As a user of my own software on my XP machine; I appreciate the new functionality it brings more so than how 'pretty' it looks. I still love a pretty face though. So this is what you can expect;

ViStart
  • Right click for windows related objects in ViStart (folders, shortcut files)
  • Better and more efficient file indexing & WDS/Vista/7 integration
  • A means of blur without DWM (Aka Blur on XP)

ViGlance
  • Skinned jumplists so that they are more like 7
  • A close button on the Windows
  • Layout.xml to customize skin options such as font color and layout of basic elements

ViSplore
  • Better shell integration with Windows
  • Add custom left-side treeview component for browsing folders (Like 7 and Vista already have)
  • Search Integration with ViStart OR WDS integration

Also there is a new Project which I am considering developing (Completely unlike the previous projects) which some people may already have an idea what this might be. The new project will be to provide a framework in the form of a scripting language (Based on JScript) where other developers can effortlessly create similar projects to my projects. Eventually to the point it would be possible to re-create projects similar to what i've developed (But with little effort).

To be able to vote you have to log into the forums and then you can vote here;
Join the community to vote on what you want developed!

    33 comments

  1. A sample size of 20 and a ratio of 14:6 is not a really meaningful for concluding that the users prefer Viglance @ Rainoffire. Having more users voting for viglance in the poll could also be a interpreted as the absence of the users of the other vi-products - because they´re pissed because they wont get any support anyways...

    Vistart for instance is close to perfections, only few bugs make it pretty useless - so i am referring to VISTART, not to just "any vi product".

    I do understand that such a small sample count is inadequate to conclude anything. What I was trying to do was answer Link6155, who asked which of the Vi-Products you were wanting to have fixed. Since I was unsure, and that you can only vote once, I thought you were talking about things in general or Viglance since it was the one that had a 1 vote up.

    As for other products with an absence in users, it is only for Visplore and ViOrb which have either been succeeded or implemented into existing software. Many now are using BorderSkins, instead of ViSplore and ViOrb is in Vistart and Viglance.


    Maybe later when all of the software reaches the peak of development, lee can make an all-in-1 .exe file.

  2. Comment by Aaron7pm -August 24 2010 @ 06:33 pm

  3. That sounds like a possibility in the future, once all have reached a stable point in development.

    It could be called ViStep or something lol.

  4. Comment by Rainoffire -August 24 2010 @ 07:20 pm

  5. Maybe later when all of the software reaches the peak of development, lee can make an all-in-1 .exe file.

    That's a great idea, assuming that single components can be switched off because I am quite happy with my classic start menu Wink.

  6. Comment by wesp5 -August 25 2010 @ 01:53 am

  7. My ViStart suggestions - PLEASE READ  Grin Grin Grin
    http://lee-soft.com/forums/index.php?topic=1802
    Basically:
    - It would be great if we were able to select the icon size for the icons in the freq used programs list (instead of being the same as that you have set for Windows)
    - Improve how Vistart works with auto-hide switched on for the taskbar (see main article)
    - Perhaps you could add in a feature like in windows 7 for properties and exit explorer

  8. Comment by jpboyrox -August 25 2010 @ 10:51 am

  9. Maybe later when all of the software reaches the peak of development, lee can make an all-in-1 .exe file.

    That's a great idea, assuming that single components can be switched off because I am quite happy with my classic start menu Wink.
    Yes it will have to have a really nice management area to turn features on/off. Ribbon Menu Maybe? I would give Lee a Copy.

  10. Comment by Aaron7pm -August 25 2010 @ 02:38 pm

  11. Idk if im asking to much or anything but something i really like about sbar and the real windows 7 taskbar is the way you can change the chat application status and on music players you can press puase and play.  that would be a great new feature for viglance... just suggesting

  12. Comment by jonnyboy11 -August 26 2010 @ 11:19 pm

  13. I know I'm the only guy who voted for ViOrb.

    I had some trouble with this.  I originally had voted for something else.

    But here's my suggestion: make ViOrb support animated GIFS if possible.
    That would make it more versatile, and give it an edge over custom start buttons for any OS!
    *And make a dramatic exit.

  14. Comment by Tangmeister -September 01 2010 @ 10:50 am

  15. I know I'm the only guy who voted for ViOrb.

    I had some trouble with this.  I originally had voted for something else.

    But here's my suggestion: make ViOrb support animated GIFS if possible.
    That would make it more versatile, and give it an edge over custom start buttons for any OS!
    *And make a dramatic exit.
    Actually 7 can have an animated Start Orb too, but still that's better than all other OSs

  16. Comment by Aaron7pm -September 01 2010 @ 03:22 pm

  17. I know I'm the only guy who voted for ViOrb.

    I had some trouble with this.  I originally had voted for something else.

    But here's my suggestion: make ViOrb support animated GIFS if possible.
    That would make it more versatile, and give it an edge over custom start buttons for any OS!
    *And make a dramatic exit.

    I was expecting that one of these days that ViOrb will have an animated Orb. Since ViStart and Viglance both have an animated Orb. I believe an option to have a static and dynamic Orb would be best for ViOrb.

  18. Comment by Rainoffire -September 01 2010 @ 06:39 pm

  19. Lee,

    please fix vistart first. To make it perfect, the probably required time effort is less than 1 day.

    What needs to be fixed:

    1. Windows commands should be executed when entered in the "search" field, such as "cmd" or "%windir%"
    2. Vistart should not block other hotkeys using the "Windows" button.

    I fear that as the poll is indicating that viglance is winning, vistart will not reach maturity, although being so close to it. Developping the new features other users are suggesting here, are requiring considerably more time effort.

    I would appreciate your opinion about it.


  20. Comment by enfant_terrible -September 02 2010 @ 03:13 am


My Blog (Latest) - Symantec a new dictatorship?

August 15, 2010, 01:41:10 PM

 

Warning.. This is a rant and it's directly aimed at Symcraptec. Well Symantec (One of the most 'trusted' names in AntiViral software) has decided to ignore my request to white-list some of my software (ViPackager - Automated Skin Installer) - After almost a month I've received no reply from Symantec on the matter and I am willing to bet that I probably wont receive a reply ever. For those of you who are unaware - Symantec will happily block software that appears to 'act suspiciously' even if its completely legitimate software that doesn't damage or harm your computer. This is completely acceptable behaviour for a AntiVirus (if the end users have a choice to unblock that questionable software that is) and usually the author of the software can write a request to the antivirus company and have their software "Approved" which means the AntiVirus company confirms its free of viruses and doesn't harm the computer - Evidently Symantec would seem to ignore the request or not even review it therefore blocking it's customers from enjoying potentially legitimate software. Furthermore the software doesn't give its user's a choice of blocking the software - it just blocks it - not even a confirmation dialogue. Most other Anti-virus software offer a confirmation dialogue at the very least with such software so the end user has the opportunity to run the software. Since some PC users trusts their AntiVirus - They will no doubt complain to the company saying "Your software is infected!". Your reputation could be ruined thanks to Symcraptec - Word of mouth will spread that you make 'harmful' software and so on.

Finally after recoding ViPackager using different methods to achieve the same goals (Which I shouldn't need to do / Symantec could have the decency to inform me to do) I was able to make ViPackager install and work with their software.  Utterly disappointed with this company -

Update 20/08/2010
It seems I need to apologise to Symantec. Although I still feel that their software could give the user a choice before it blocks something "it thinks" is suspicious. However I am pleased that they replied at the very least. At the request of Symantec I will not be posting their decision on the matter though.

    14 comments
  1. Having a symantec application on ones computer is enough to slow it down by about 25%.
    Actually they fixed that in All of the 2010 products and narrowed it down to only ~5-10%. The new Norton 360 4 is the best by far.

    Norton 360 is quite a protection suite. Although, the ~5-10% drawback is because Norton no makes use of multi-core processors and large Ram capacity. If you have like on of the older dual cores or have around like 2gb, Norton does take a serious toll on the computer.

    I heard good things about Norton Ghost too. An excellent Backup application in most user opinion.
    Actually the new version of Norton 360 (The one I am currently using) Has the Ghost backup system included.

  2. Comment by Aaron7pm -August 16 2010 @ 03:33 pm

  3. Is that so, when I used 360 before it didn't have Ghost with it. Or I may have missed it...

    Unsure if Symantec is changing for the better though. Bundling everything into one suite is nice, but I still do think their customer service sucks. Even paying a yearly subscription doesn't help... I would expect to believe that a company that I pay for would have much more highly trained customer assitance. Kinda like having Advertisement when you are a paying user... Isn't Ads only meant for Free users?

    The other AntiViral applications have free versions of their applications, and have decent customer support...

  4. Comment by Rainoffire -August 16 2010 @ 03:41 pm

  5. Is that so, when I used 360 before it didn't have Ghost with it. Or I may have missed it...

    Unsure if Symantec is changing for the better though. Bundling everything into one suite is nice, but I still do think their customer service sucks. Even paying a yearly subscription doesn't help... I would expect to believe that a company that I pay for would have much more highly trained customer assitance. Kinda like having Advertisement when you are a paying user... Isn't Ads only meant for Free users?

    The other AntiViral applications have free versions of their applications, and have decent customer support...
    Soooooo true... The best they got for free is a pathetic 60 Day Trial, and their support is the worst by far.

  6. Comment by Aaron7pm -August 16 2010 @ 04:28 pm

  7. Is that so, when I used 360 before it didn't have Ghost with it. Or I may have missed it...

    Unsure if Symantec is changing for the better though. Bundling everything into one suite is nice, but I still do think their customer service sucks. Even paying a yearly subscription doesn't help... I would expect to believe that a company that I pay for would have much more highly trained customer assitance. Kinda like having Advertisement when you are a paying user... Isn't Ads only meant for Free users?

    The other AntiViral applications have free versions of their applications, and have decent customer support...
    Soooooo true... The best they got for free is a pathetic 60 Day Trial, and their support is the worst by far.

    I hate Symantec's Trialware the most... The trials for their lastest software only last until the trials expire. After that, it is simply USELESS, just there to eat a large amount of resources... Among the Norton Trials, i use 2007, since it is the only one that allows you to use even after it expires, it just has some annoying message saying you need to pay again to use... The new ones won't even scan, and you can't change any settings after it expires, BUT it still has the really annoying message.

    Also, uninstalling any Symantec products is NEVER a full uninstall... Some registries, root level data, and some other files still linger after an uninstall. And some times, due to root level installs, uninstalling Norton can have some negative effects on a computer.

  8. Comment by Rainoffire -August 16 2010 @ 04:43 pm

  9. Is that so, when I used 360 before it didn't have Ghost with it. Or I may have missed it...

    Unsure if Symantec is changing for the better though. Bundling everything into one suite is nice, but I still do think their customer service sucks. Even paying a yearly subscription doesn't help... I would expect to believe that a company that I pay for would have much more highly trained customer assitance. Kinda like having Advertisement when you are a paying user... Isn't Ads only meant for Free users?

    The other AntiViral applications have free versions of their applications, and have decent customer support...
    Soooooo true... The best they got for free is a pathetic 60 Day Trial, and their support is the worst by far.

    I hate Symantec's Trialware the most... The trials for their lastest software only last until the trials expire. After that, it is simply USELESS, just there to eat a large amount of resources... Among the Norton Trials, i use 2007, since it is the only one that allows you to use even after it expires, it just has some annoying message saying you need to pay again to use... The new ones won't even scan, and you can't change any settings after it expires, BUT it still has the really annoying message.

    Also, uninstalling any Symantec products is NEVER a full uninstall... Some registries, root level data, and some other files still linger after an uninstall. And some times, due to root level installs, uninstalling Norton can have some negative effects on a computer.
    I use trial resets and stuff. I have a few legit copies on my main computer though.

  10. Comment by Aaron7pm -August 16 2010 @ 04:48 pm

  11. I have legit copies too, but once they expire, they are "Useless" in every meaning of the word...
    Trial resets are too much of a hassle, since it is every 15, 30 or 60 days.

    Norton has gone down hill for power users... Average and Casual users don't really mind the trial stuff, and most of them will just cough up the cash anyways. Norton seems to be getting a lot of money. You can tell by how lazy the tech support is, and how they are able to shell out trialware to every name brand computer out there...

    When a company becomes big, it always seems like they neglect the people that put them up there in the first place...

    All the big names in the market have somehow made terrible decisions once they have reached the top. Microsoft with Vista, 360 RROD, Apple with short live batteries, exploding batteries, iPhone 4 antenna, Sony with mass battery recalls, rookits in usb drives, PS2 DRE, PS3 YLOD, and other companies that are top in their market. Not to bash on Dell or HP, but their products aren't necessarily top of the line...

    It is only when these companies reach the top, is when they start going down.

  12. Comment by Rainoffire -August 16 2010 @ 05:06 pm

  13. It is only when these companies reach the top, is when they start going down.
    That's my quote of the day!

  14. Comment by Aaron7pm -August 16 2010 @ 05:11 pm

  15. Didn't bother to read any of the posts in this thread. Just came here to say
    Symantec is fail. Trash it.
    /failopinion
    That is all~

  16. Comment by Fate -August 17 2010 @ 12:09 am

  17. It is only when these companies reach the top, is when they start going down.

    That's quite a good quote.

  18. Comment by Lee -August 17 2010 @ 01:28 am

  19. It is only when these companies reach the top, is when they start going down.
    That's my quote of the day!
    It is only when these companies reach the top, is when they start going down.

    That's quite a good quote.

    I actually didn't think it would have gotten such recognition. I guess when you follow a certain company for so long, and then you realise that they are nickel and diming you, you would tend to start ranting and raging.

    I followed Symantec for so long, since I thought they were a great anti-viral company. But now is not the case. They are technically still in the top of the market, but the are just all talk and no show.

  20. Comment by Rainoffire -September 01 2010 @ 06:50 pm