Welcome to Lee-Soft.com, I hope you enjoy your stay


Dev Blog (Latest) - What's next for Lee-Soft.com - You decide!

August 17, 2010, 05:24:28 AM

 


After I release a new ViGlance build next month to fix the minor issues people are having with the new build - I will be turning my attention to another project and developing that for a while. At this stage; I am pleased with ViStart's current stability and ViGlance's current stability and I would primarily be focusing on new features for these products (if I were to develop them). However the other projects which are collecting dust such as ViSplore and ViOrb need stability improvements. ViOrb still operates on a hooking mechanism which I decided last year isn't viable (For those unaware - hooking means to literally hack another process and catch the information it receives and process them in your application (Imagine having a mail forwarding on your inbox - It would surely take longer for the messages to get forwarded). ViSplore currently doesn't add anything new (other than breadcrumb toolbar) to Explorer and it still doesn't replace the default explorer correctly. Whilst eye-candy is everything to some users - functionality is more important to me - Eye candy comes after in my opinion. As a user of my own software on my XP machine; I appreciate the new functionality it brings more so than how 'pretty' it looks. I still love a pretty face though. So this is what you can expect;

ViStart
  • Right click for windows related objects in ViStart (folders, shortcut files)
  • Better and more efficient file indexing & WDS/Vista/7 integration
  • A means of blur without DWM (Aka Blur on XP)

ViGlance
  • Skinned jumplists so that they are more like 7
  • A close button on the Windows
  • Layout.xml to customize skin options such as font color and layout of basic elements

ViSplore
  • Better shell integration with Windows
  • Add custom left-side treeview component for browsing folders (Like 7 and Vista already have)
  • Search Integration with ViStart OR WDS integration

Also there is a new Project which I am considering developing (Completely unlike the previous projects) which some people may already have an idea what this might be. The new project will be to provide a framework in the form of a scripting language (Based on JScript) where other developers can effortlessly create similar projects to my projects. Eventually to the point it would be possible to re-create projects similar to what i've developed (But with little effort).

To be able to vote you have to log into the forums and then you can vote here;
Join the community to vote on what you want developed!

    44 comments

  1. approximitly  how long will it take to update viglance cuz id like to stop checking this site every single hour in hope of the update to be released im exited for the jumplists its my favorite feauture
    Um ViGlance SE2 is already released with the jumplists.

  2. Comment by Aaron7pm -September 03 2010 @ 05:32 pm

  3. I believe he was having troubles with Viglance on Vista, not having the Jumplist.

  4. Comment by Rainoffire -September 03 2010 @ 05:50 pm

  5. yes it doesnt work on mine, im hoping that the new release with skinned jumplist will fix it, i got vista home basic if that matters

  6. Comment by jonnyboy11 -September 03 2010 @ 11:32 pm

  7. The jumplist was tested on my Vista. My Vista is a 64bit Business. Not sure if the registries that pull up the jumplist is different on other versions of Vista.

  8. Comment by Rainoffire -September 04 2010 @ 05:07 am

  9. I just tested it on Vista 32bit, jumplist doesn't work.

  10. Comment by link6155 -September 04 2010 @ 01:18 pm

  11. Yeah so I was right! The bug still persists!.

  12. Comment by Aaron7pm -September 04 2010 @ 01:28 pm

  13. I just tested it on my Vista 32bit Homme Premium, and the jumplist works on it.

    Not sure on what is happening. During testing, it wasn't working for both of my Vista's. Lee will require registry entries to fix this problem.

  14. Comment by Rainoffire -September 04 2010 @ 09:38 pm

  15.  Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin

  16. Comment by reyzilp -September 05 2010 @ 06:36 am

  17. My Priority List:

    1. [ViStart] Support Windows Key Shortcuts <-- my proposition
    http://www.seoconsultants.com/windows/key/
    all these key shortcuts are most common key shortcuts, but only <win> and <alt>+<tab> work after ViStart started
    2. [ViStart] Merge ViOrb with ViStart  <-- my suggestion
    3. [ViGlance] A close button on the Windows  <-- also on your list
    4. [ViStart] Bug
        1. lauch ViStart, (ViGlance or ViOrb)
        2. exit (ViGlance or ViOrb)
        3. the windows start button back

        1. input letters in ViStart Start Search Bar
        2. if there's no items match with the input text, the program/back button got focus auto

        1. when the vistart menu popup, start search bar doesn't got focus by default, but you can press any key to focus on it

    -----------------------------------

    my suggestion is,
    for ViStart, fix bugs and focus on integration
    for ViGlance, fix bugs and focus on new feature

    5. [ViSplore] Better shell integration with Windows <-- this will make ViSplore popular
    6. [ViStart] Better and more efficient file indexing & WDS/Vista/7 integration
    7. [ViGlance] Skinned jumplists so that they are more like 7
    8. [ViSplore] Search Integration with ViStart OR WDS integration

    9. [ViStart] Right click for windows related objects in ViStart (folders, shortcut files)

    by the way, after i updated ViStart to 7, the start button turn into windows 7 size.
    however, it cause an annoy issue.
    i installed a useful plug-in on firefox called measureit, and it's launch button just upon the start button.
    then you can imagine most of the time i try to click the launch button but the start button was clicked.
    so please, keep the start button having same height with the taskbar.

    cheers

  18. Comment by jueljust -September 05 2010 @ 12:23 pm

  19. very good and accurate post @ juel just. I fully agree on your first points, fixing vistart is the top issue.

    I'd add the windows command support for the search field as a top priority, which was mentioned by enfant terible.

  20. Comment by randyrandalf -September 06 2010 @ 08:09 am


My Blog (Latest) - Symantec a new dictatorship?

August 15, 2010, 01:41:10 PM

 

Warning.. This is a rant and it's directly aimed at Symcraptec. Well Symantec (One of the most 'trusted' names in AntiViral software) has decided to ignore my request to white-list some of my software (ViPackager - Automated Skin Installer) - After almost a month I've received no reply from Symantec on the matter and I am willing to bet that I probably wont receive a reply ever. For those of you who are unaware - Symantec will happily block software that appears to 'act suspiciously' even if its completely legitimate software that doesn't damage or harm your computer. This is completely acceptable behaviour for a AntiVirus (if the end users have a choice to unblock that questionable software that is) and usually the author of the software can write a request to the antivirus company and have their software "Approved" which means the AntiVirus company confirms its free of viruses and doesn't harm the computer - Evidently Symantec would seem to ignore the request or not even review it therefore blocking it's customers from enjoying potentially legitimate software. Furthermore the software doesn't give its user's a choice of blocking the software - it just blocks it - not even a confirmation dialogue. Most other Anti-virus software offer a confirmation dialogue at the very least with such software so the end user has the opportunity to run the software. Since some PC users trusts their AntiVirus - They will no doubt complain to the company saying "Your software is infected!". Your reputation could be ruined thanks to Symcraptec - Word of mouth will spread that you make 'harmful' software and so on.

Finally after recoding ViPackager using different methods to achieve the same goals (Which I shouldn't need to do / Symantec could have the decency to inform me to do) I was able to make ViPackager install and work with their software.  Utterly disappointed with this company -

Update 20/08/2010
It seems I need to apologise to Symantec. Although I still feel that their software could give the user a choice before it blocks something "it thinks" is suspicious. However I am pleased that they replied at the very least. At the request of Symantec I will not be posting their decision on the matter though.

    14 comments
  1. Having a symantec application on ones computer is enough to slow it down by about 25%.
    Actually they fixed that in All of the 2010 products and narrowed it down to only ~5-10%. The new Norton 360 4 is the best by far.

    Norton 360 is quite a protection suite. Although, the ~5-10% drawback is because Norton no makes use of multi-core processors and large Ram capacity. If you have like on of the older dual cores or have around like 2gb, Norton does take a serious toll on the computer.

    I heard good things about Norton Ghost too. An excellent Backup application in most user opinion.
    Actually the new version of Norton 360 (The one I am currently using) Has the Ghost backup system included.

  2. Comment by Aaron7pm -August 16 2010 @ 03:33 pm

  3. Is that so, when I used 360 before it didn't have Ghost with it. Or I may have missed it...

    Unsure if Symantec is changing for the better though. Bundling everything into one suite is nice, but I still do think their customer service sucks. Even paying a yearly subscription doesn't help... I would expect to believe that a company that I pay for would have much more highly trained customer assitance. Kinda like having Advertisement when you are a paying user... Isn't Ads only meant for Free users?

    The other AntiViral applications have free versions of their applications, and have decent customer support...

  4. Comment by Rainoffire -August 16 2010 @ 03:41 pm

  5. Is that so, when I used 360 before it didn't have Ghost with it. Or I may have missed it...

    Unsure if Symantec is changing for the better though. Bundling everything into one suite is nice, but I still do think their customer service sucks. Even paying a yearly subscription doesn't help... I would expect to believe that a company that I pay for would have much more highly trained customer assitance. Kinda like having Advertisement when you are a paying user... Isn't Ads only meant for Free users?

    The other AntiViral applications have free versions of their applications, and have decent customer support...
    Soooooo true... The best they got for free is a pathetic 60 Day Trial, and their support is the worst by far.

  6. Comment by Aaron7pm -August 16 2010 @ 04:28 pm

  7. Is that so, when I used 360 before it didn't have Ghost with it. Or I may have missed it...

    Unsure if Symantec is changing for the better though. Bundling everything into one suite is nice, but I still do think their customer service sucks. Even paying a yearly subscription doesn't help... I would expect to believe that a company that I pay for would have much more highly trained customer assitance. Kinda like having Advertisement when you are a paying user... Isn't Ads only meant for Free users?

    The other AntiViral applications have free versions of their applications, and have decent customer support...
    Soooooo true... The best they got for free is a pathetic 60 Day Trial, and their support is the worst by far.

    I hate Symantec's Trialware the most... The trials for their lastest software only last until the trials expire. After that, it is simply USELESS, just there to eat a large amount of resources... Among the Norton Trials, i use 2007, since it is the only one that allows you to use even after it expires, it just has some annoying message saying you need to pay again to use... The new ones won't even scan, and you can't change any settings after it expires, BUT it still has the really annoying message.

    Also, uninstalling any Symantec products is NEVER a full uninstall... Some registries, root level data, and some other files still linger after an uninstall. And some times, due to root level installs, uninstalling Norton can have some negative effects on a computer.

  8. Comment by Rainoffire -August 16 2010 @ 04:43 pm

  9. Is that so, when I used 360 before it didn't have Ghost with it. Or I may have missed it...

    Unsure if Symantec is changing for the better though. Bundling everything into one suite is nice, but I still do think their customer service sucks. Even paying a yearly subscription doesn't help... I would expect to believe that a company that I pay for would have much more highly trained customer assitance. Kinda like having Advertisement when you are a paying user... Isn't Ads only meant for Free users?

    The other AntiViral applications have free versions of their applications, and have decent customer support...
    Soooooo true... The best they got for free is a pathetic 60 Day Trial, and their support is the worst by far.

    I hate Symantec's Trialware the most... The trials for their lastest software only last until the trials expire. After that, it is simply USELESS, just there to eat a large amount of resources... Among the Norton Trials, i use 2007, since it is the only one that allows you to use even after it expires, it just has some annoying message saying you need to pay again to use... The new ones won't even scan, and you can't change any settings after it expires, BUT it still has the really annoying message.

    Also, uninstalling any Symantec products is NEVER a full uninstall... Some registries, root level data, and some other files still linger after an uninstall. And some times, due to root level installs, uninstalling Norton can have some negative effects on a computer.
    I use trial resets and stuff. I have a few legit copies on my main computer though.

  10. Comment by Aaron7pm -August 16 2010 @ 04:48 pm

  11. I have legit copies too, but once they expire, they are "Useless" in every meaning of the word...
    Trial resets are too much of a hassle, since it is every 15, 30 or 60 days.

    Norton has gone down hill for power users... Average and Casual users don't really mind the trial stuff, and most of them will just cough up the cash anyways. Norton seems to be getting a lot of money. You can tell by how lazy the tech support is, and how they are able to shell out trialware to every name brand computer out there...

    When a company becomes big, it always seems like they neglect the people that put them up there in the first place...

    All the big names in the market have somehow made terrible decisions once they have reached the top. Microsoft with Vista, 360 RROD, Apple with short live batteries, exploding batteries, iPhone 4 antenna, Sony with mass battery recalls, rookits in usb drives, PS2 DRE, PS3 YLOD, and other companies that are top in their market. Not to bash on Dell or HP, but their products aren't necessarily top of the line...

    It is only when these companies reach the top, is when they start going down.

  12. Comment by Rainoffire -August 16 2010 @ 05:06 pm

  13. It is only when these companies reach the top, is when they start going down.
    That's my quote of the day!

  14. Comment by Aaron7pm -August 16 2010 @ 05:11 pm

  15. Didn't bother to read any of the posts in this thread. Just came here to say
    Symantec is fail. Trash it.
    /failopinion
    That is all~

  16. Comment by Fate -August 17 2010 @ 12:09 am

  17. It is only when these companies reach the top, is when they start going down.

    That's quite a good quote.

  18. Comment by Lee -August 17 2010 @ 01:28 am

  19. It is only when these companies reach the top, is when they start going down.
    That's my quote of the day!
    It is only when these companies reach the top, is when they start going down.

    That's quite a good quote.

    I actually didn't think it would have gotten such recognition. I guess when you follow a certain company for so long, and then you realise that they are nickel and diming you, you would tend to start ranting and raging.

    I followed Symantec for so long, since I thought they were a great anti-viral company. But now is not the case. They are technically still in the top of the market, but the are just all talk and no show.

  20. Comment by Rainoffire -September 01 2010 @ 06:50 pm